@ nfl...Bengals will have 4 wins unless they lose to Phoenix. Blitz only have 3 u do the math
I guess you guys are missing the point. Mr. Bosworth gave a great example. It's unfortunate for the Cutters but it was obviously voted on. It is completely fair because they knew before the season what they needed to do to move on. Every system has its perks and downfalls, you two just fail to see the Wildcard format flaws.
It is flawed and that is the reason that I felt that something else could have been done, now it is easy for me to say that because we are the ones that fell prey to this, however in all honesty, had it been the Xtreme and another team got in over them I would be saying the same thing, IN THIS SITUATION. Now, if the IFL would have still had the 8 teams or 10 teams that we began with, then yes, you played the games and the original format should stand, but when you lose 4 teams, only leaving you with 6 teams total, I believe that every team should have made it, highest seed could have played the lowest seed, or the 2 teams in 1st place could have had a bye, even if only to give everybody one more game. I mean this was just crazy this yr, We played the Xtreme twice, WCW twice and the Destroyers; 5 games is not something that we planned for and it hurts that our season has been going on since mid june but we only played 5 games....
VOTE 4 IT, while i agree with you on this topic i will say this one thing, it isnt Troy's job to start such a movement, while it would be great, and it would be what i believe the right thing is, he is here to be an overseer and make sure that what the MAJORITY wants is done. Just being honest, anybody that saw us play this past weekend does not want to see a team like that make it into the playoffs, with the exception of maybe one or two ppl, if that....because truth be told if the Xtreme were rolling and getting things together like that nobody would be sad about them not making it either because the goal here is to win it all, and inviting a dangerous team to play for it all is just that, DANGEROUS. The teams that are supposed to be in the playoffs are in, we had our shot and we are already getting ready for next season. If more ppl in the league felt that something should be done, trust that something would be, but we, as a league, have decided to stand by what WE, including the Cutters, voted on, it just sucks that it came back to bite us....lol
When the Eagles and Destroyers "officially" folded - I presumed that each IFL team would be ranked 1-6 and with all participants making the playoffs (to lengthen an already shortened season). The top seed (overall) would host #6 and so on. It would give teams some cross-over match-ups that otherwise wouldn't take place and allow part of the competition that we all paid for to occur.
This wasn't the case, and like many have mentioned the "season" ended up being a half of schedule at best. If you take a look at our schedule(s) - we had FOUR TEAMS (Hitmen, Mustangs, Destroyers and Eagles) fold before we ever saw them on the field.
That being said - there are six quality organizations in the IFL right now, not many leagues can say that 100% of their participants are solid franchises. We didn't win a league game this year, but we competed each week, offered a first class facility and were able to go 3-0 in non-conference play (two wins coming against the GLFL DII champs).
Good luck and good health to all of the teams still battling in the 2012 season. I've been playing at this level for all but two seasons since 2001 and I'd like to thank each of you for the memories over the past decade.
I would be fine with the current playoff format or what you guys are wanting the only issue I have is why wait until playoff time to bring this up? The six teams that played through the entire season have known that the eagles and destroyers folded weeks ago.. So just because now a team that 'deserves' to be there isn't it is now a problem? If it really bothered a particular team that much it would've been discussed right away and not when they realized they didn't make it. I feel there should be a bylaw in place that if a team(s) were to fold then here is the format for X amount of teams and I would have that in place for each number. So 8 teams would be top 2 teams each divisions, 7 would be bla bla bla, 6 would be bla bla bla, and so on.
Yeah Jason and Drekey I was directing that message toward the person who started the thread not you guys. I agree with both of you guys on the subject just wish we would have had alternative solutions for if teams fold in place.